Ieder misbruikt kind is er eentje teveel. Toch gebeurt dit aan de lopende band en is de aandacht voor deze ellende in mijn ogen niet voldoende. Dit zou niet een beetje, maar heel veel meer aandacht moeten krijgen, als je het mij vraagt. Maar mensen denken hier liever niet over na, onder het motto "Als ik m'n ogen ervoor sluit, dan bestaat het niet"...
Hoe droevig die constatering ook is, vanuit die positie is het niet lastig te begrijpen dat wanneer verhalen de kop op steken van kindermisbruik door de elite, structureel en wijdverspreid, dat deze linea recta naar het land der fabelen worden verwezen. Inhoudelijk kijken naar de beweringen, bewijzen en belangen is er dan niet meer bij.
Maar door er geen aandacht aan te geven, verdwijnt het probleem niet. Een probleem? Yep, een gigantisch groot probleem. Wat de proporties zijn staat niet vast, maar meer onderzoek naar deze morbide wereld is gerechtvaardigd als je dit onderwerp wel in de ogen durft te kijken. De documentaire reeks Elite Human Trafficking doet dat en nodigt uit tot verder onderzoek.
Elite Human Trafficking is een serie van 6 korte video's, die samen zo'n anderhalf uur beslaan, van Mouthy Buddha. Deze naam kende ik nog van Pedogate 2020, een onderzoek naar de bredere implicaties van Pizzagate. Eerder al deelde ik deze driedelige documentaire Pedogate 2020, vol met informatie die ik niet eerder had gezien. Bij het ontdekken van Elite Human Trafficking zag ik dat de 2020 reeks ook nog een vierde deel had gekregen, Cuties, en OMG!!! 🤯
Gezien Elite Human Trafficking een duidelijk vervolg is op Pedogate 2020, deel ik naast die nieuwe 6 delen ook de 4 eerdere delen uit 2020. Met 10 video's, in totaal ruim 3 uur, is deze documentaire een indrukwekkend product welke je aan het denken zet.
Maar dit onderwerp is en blijft lastig te bevatten, ook voor mij. Zoals je op mijn blog kunt zien, komt en gaat de aandacht voor dit onderwerp. Het verdwijnt steeds weer naar de achtergrond van mijn aandacht, maar het bijzondere is dat het ook steeds weer terug komt. Ook in deze periode van 2024, blijkbaar. Een kort fragment uit de 3e nieuwe video vat dit complexe dillema voor mij goed samen:
Titus Frost deed in de tijd van Pizzagate echt ontzettend veel onderzoek. Dat is onder andere te zien in deze 3 delen van Pizzagate Deep Investigation. Het is voor mij alweer jaren geleden dat ik dit zag, dus weet het qua inhoud niet zo goed meer. Maar ik ben erg benieuwd wat hij ook alweer te vertellen had. Er staat me iets bij van @Bigfish zijn hackresultaten toen hij op de computer van Comet Ping-pong, van James Alefantis aka Jimmy Comet, aan het inbreken was en daar een verborgen sectie met kinderporno vond!
Maar goed , dat is nog niet zo maar gevonden, want bij elkaar opgeteld duurt dit ruim 7 uur!
Deze video uit 2019 van Amazing Polly laat mooi zien hoe een brede aanval op Fox News host Tucker Carlson vanuit de Pizzagate invalshoek bekeken kan worden. De lastercampagne werd opgezet door Media Matters van David Brock, mattie van mensen als Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Tony Podesta, Marina Abramović en niet in de laatste plaats ex-vriend van James Alefantis, jimmy Comet, eigenaar van Comet Ping-pong, welke in het middelpunt van Pizzagate stond.
TUCKER ATTACKED BY THE RICHEST MOST TWISTED SWAMP CREATURES EVER
Buckle up. I'm going to show you exactly why no one should listen to these freaks at Media Matters or any of their sick, depraved billionaire donors and associates. These swamp creatures are perverted goons whose crimes are not only covered up but whitewashed by the media! ... more...
They call us names?? They DARE to lecture us about 'tolerance' and 'inclusion?" Are you kidding me? In this video I show the history of David Brock, John & Tony Podesta, George Soros and other mega donors to Media Matters. I also go over the links they have to pe-do-ph-il-ia and how the Clintons help the worst scum of the Earth to avoid jail time.
Deze documentaire deelde ik eind 2020 al, maar ik zag dat de video van YouTube verwijderd was. Goh!?! Nu kon je de video altijd nog bekijken via de website van de documentaire, maar ik heb de video op Bitchute alsnog ingesloten. Daarmee had ik meteen een goede reden dit normaals onder jullie aandacht te brengen. Hieronder dus het oude artikel, met verse video!
Er is een nieuwe documentaire uitgekomen die ik echt iedereen wil aanraden te kijken: 'Out of Shadows'.
Het behandelt onderwerpen als hoe Hollywood en de media de geest van de mens beïnvloeden, Operation Mockingbird, Operation Paperclip, MK-Ultra, de False Flag in de Gulf of Tonkin waardoor de oorlog in Vietnam begon, kindermisbruik door de elite, satanisme én Pizzagate! Ik was de laatste weken alweer meer in deze materie gedoken en zag verschillende bronnen erover publiceren, maar deze documentaire is toch wel de reden voor mij om mijn blog na een jaar weer nieuw leven in te blazen. In mijn optiek moet je dit gewoon gezien hebben!
De omschrijving van de makers:
"The Out Of Shadows documentary lifts the mask on how the mainstream media & Hollywood manipulate & control the masses by spreading propaganda throughout their content. Our goal is to wake up the general public by shedding light on how we all have been lied to & brainwashed by a hidden enemy with a sinister agenda.
This project is the result of two years of blood, sweat and tears by a team of woke professionals. It’s been independently produced and funded and is available on many different platforms for FREE for anyone to watch. Patriots made this documentary with the sole purpose of getting the truth out there. If you like the documentary, please share this video.
You can support our team and future projects by making a donation below."
https://www.outofshadows.org/
Hopelijk helpt deze documentaire je ogen te openen en deel je het met de mensen om je heen.
Wat niet onbelangrijk is om te weten is dat YouTube deze video niet meer toont in de zoekresultaten wanneer je zelfs letterlijk op de titel zoekt. Zoiets heet delisting of shadow banning. Hoe toepasselijk is de titel dan, niet?
Ik kwam hier achter nadat het YouTube kanaal Memory Hold diens kijkers hierop wees. Ik ben het daarna zelf gaan controleren, een dag later, en bij mij hetzelfde resultaat: Na 15 pagina's naar beneden klikken vond ik wel het kanaal, maar de video zelf heb ik niet terug kunnen vinden. Zie hiervoor de onderstaande video.
Dit is regelrechte censuur die wordt toegepast op een video waarvan 'de elite' niet wil dat die boodschap breed gehoord wordt. Helaas pindakaas, want ondanks dit walgelijke beleid is de video na een week al ruim 8.000.000 maal bekeken! En dan heb ik het louter over de originele video en niet over de kopieën of andere platforums die de video tonen.
Nogmaals, please check de video en deel het waar je kunt.
Het bewijs dat de video niet terug te vinden is in de zoekresultaten van YouTube:
David Seaman is one of the few online reporters on the subject of Pizzagate. He can be found on several platforms and publishes regularly. I follow him on his YouTube Channel. He is vocal and offensive but he sometimes claims stuff that can't be verified. We have to trust him on this.
To be clear, I am glad Seaman stays vocal on Pizzagate. As long as nothing has been debunked (contrary to msm claims) this should not disappear off the radar. But... I do not trust a single soul when it comes to cases of alleged child abuse. I have seen to much nonsense and misinformation to just accept things on "the word" of somebody. A claim has to have tangible evidence to support it, and if not, the claim is of no use. So note that, "of NO use". It is neither true or false.
Let me give an example about his most recent video on Pizzagate. In this video he states several things, but let me focus on two of them:
1. Judd Legum Vs. Brittany Pettibone
2. Homeland Security investigates Pizzagate
Judd Legum Vs. Brittany Pettibone
In the video Seaman Talks about Legum attacking Pettibone via GoFundMe, so she would be hit monetary. He shows a screenshot of the Tweet Legum sent and talks about the GoFundMe page of Pettibone taken down. No matter what you think of this, this is something that we can go verify on our own. You can use a search engine to find out who these people are and what their connections are. Then you could go to Twitter and try to find out if this narrative was really the case. And I think one specific tweet from Legum sums it all up, yes it happened. So now you can go and make up your mind what you think of this.
To their credit, @gofundme now deleted this campaign, citing their TOS. My timeline is full of vile trolls but that's OK. https://t.co/HMaGQLm5MA
In the video Seaman talks about Homeland Security that is "allegedly" active on the Pizzagate case, as he has stated before. Just like he stated the FBI was on the case, something that has been claimed by Ryan O'Neal as well. This on the contrary to Legum Vs. Pettibone can not be verified on our own. When I asked both Seaman and O'Neal if there are any sources to back up this claim, I got no response.
This means we have to go on the word of somebody, in this case 1 or 2 persons. But as long as I can not verify this in any way, it is of no value. Again, I can not say the claim is untrue, I just can't give ANY value to it, both positive and negative.
Next to the lack of verifiable evidence for these claims, I just have a hard time to believe ANY government agency would act on Pizzagate. I gave my personal perception on Pizzagate and the broader implications in a 2-part video series earlier. (Part 1 & Part 2) In this I talked about the phenomenon of Sexpionage and pedophilia being a useful tool in the process. Since this is an extensive talk, with lots and lots of information in it, the subject of Sexpionage got delved under the rest of the information. So I made a separate video on the subject. I have tried to get this subject, and specifically the extensive research of Sibel Edmonds on Dennis Hastert, to the attention of David Seaman on both Twitter and YouTube, but I never got a response.
The point in short is the following: Secret Services combined spy on EVERYBODY, no exceptions. So all communications between, for example, James Alefantis and David Brock can be searched in no time. Not just email, but all other communication as well. So... it should not be a problem of any kind to filter the communications of people suspected of being involved in Pizzagate, and even broader than that. But... We don't see that happening while Pizzagate has been going on for months now... And when even the hundreds and hundreds of Pentagon employees get of the hook, while downloading child pornography or having it on their computers... Why on earth would they dig into Pizzagate, possibly the biggest scandal in global political history?!
I really need more credible evidence to back up the claim DHS is on the case, because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The mere word of David Seaman is just not enough. This does not mean what he stated is Untrue, it just has no supporting evidence to prove it is true, so it had NO value at all.
Metadata
In recent weeks there was big excitement because a Pizzagate researcher called Ryan Alexander O'Neal claimed he was being death threatened by James Alefantis, one of the main characters in the Pizzagate scandal. To be clear again, I have seen no evidence this was actually the case. I have seen text messages, a phone number check and even a screen recording of Ryan trying to prove his Facebook contact with Alefantis. Even if it was all done with the best intentions, there was no solid proof this narrative actually took place. This does not mean O'Neal is a fraud or lying, there is just NO value to this story, until he has supporting evidence.
David Seaman has been talking about Ryan allegedly being death threatened by Alefantis in several of his videos. The word "allegedly" is used lots of times by Seaman, but when he leaves this critical word out, things are presented as being a fact. When he makes such claims, he should have tangible solid evidence to back it up. So when we listen to what Seaman has to say about Ryan something peculiar can be noted...
Seaman claims on several occasions the researcher that was threatened by Alefantis was at that time extracting the "Metadata" from the pictures of the Instagram account of Jimmy Comet, a.k.a. James Alefantis. Metadata is potentially very useful. The date the photo was taken can be found this way, or the geographic location where the photo was taken.
This claim, researchers extracting metadata for Pizzagate pictures was new to me, and since he kept repeating this, I wondered if there was any truth to it. Since I never ever got one response from Seaman on one of my attempts to connect to him, I was not under the illusion he would answer me this time on my questions about the Metadata, perhaps I even asked about it 1 time before... But I asked Ryan about it on YouTube and no answer as well from O'Neal...
So again on this claim: No tangible solid evidence to back up the claim? -> Claim is of NO value...
And just as with the Homeland Security claim there are more remarks to be made about this claim besides the lack of supporting evidence. It is essential when you want to extract metadata form pictures to have the original photos. So when you claim people are extracting metadata for Jimmy Comet his Instagram pictures, the original photos is what should be worked with. But to my best knowledge these photos are not commonly floating around the web, if they exist at all. The most common thing we encounter are screenshots of this Instagram account or archived pages, no original photos. So what sources would the researchers had to work with? The originals. Are they available? Not to my knowledge. So how could they extract metadata if they don't have the needed sources for this? Quite impossible...
Don't get me wrong, I have no proof these original photos did not exist, so I could not claim the claims of Seaman were inaccurate. I just couldn't give ANY value to his metadata claims.
A clean record
For any researcher it is important to keep a clean record so he can build up credibility over time. The more evidence to support your claims, the more credible you get. If you don't support claims you loose credibility, so one should be careful what to claim. In this extra sensitive case of Pizzagate it is of utmost importance to keep a clean record, with the least amount of unsupported claims possible.
When you claim something without supporting evidence, and later on it gets debunked, it is important to rectify. Making mistakes is human, nothing wrong with that, as long as you rectify when proven wrong.
David Seaman is proud of his track record and he mentions this regularly during his videos. And recently he claimed he had a clean record when it comes to Pizzagate as well. He states:
"Nothing I said on this YouTube channel over the last couple of months has been factually inaccurate."
As I explained before, if I have no evidence to the contrary of his claim, it indeed is not factually inaccurate. But to be fair, lots of point have not been proven to be accurate either. Until now...
Recently the alleged death threatened Pizzagate researcher Ryan Alexander O'Neal gave an interview with Random Rants of Ryan. The day before the interview I made several remarks on the story of O'Neal, and I had one question about the metadata, as claimed by Seaman. During the interview he did not reply to all of my remarks, although I think it were fair points. He did give an answer about the claim of David Seaman.
In short: Ryan O'Neal states he was NOT extracting metadata from the Pizzagate photos. He had not ever seen this researched before on Voat either. He had never heard of metadata until Seaman mentioned this. That makes the repeated claim of Seaman inaccurate, contrary to his claim. That is not a problem, as long as the author, in this case Seaman, rectifies himself, so he has a clean record again.
Again, it is of utmost importance to rectify, otherwise you will give the opposition a tool to cut you down on that point. When they cut you down on one issue, all other issues you mention will be labeled "FakeNews" as well. This MUST be avoided at any time. It is essential to remove this piece of misinformation out of the bulk of info we have on Pizzagate. Another important reason for him to rectify is so other people do not keep disseminating this inaccurate information till eternity.
Because David Seaman has never responded to any of my attempts reaching out to him, I don't think a simple comment underneath one of his videos will do the trick. But I cant stress often enough how important it is for a top Pizzagate investigator to keep his record clean... So I had to find another way.
I collected all movies in which Seaman made claims about the metadata and the video interview of Ryan with Random Rants of Ryan. I cut out the specific quotes and pasted this all into MovieMaker. I added some screens to it to clarify my point, and to ask my question at Seaman to rectify this specific statement. I uploaded this movie to my YouTube channel and wrote this blog to support the video.
I will post this link underneath his recent and upcoming videos, hopefully reaching him in that way. If people know how to reach him, please do. Not for me, but for David Seaman. It is his track record we are talking about. So please reach out to him so he can rectify and keep his record clean again. Thanks in advance to everybody sharing this information with Seaman.
Hopefully my video is clear and makes the point about the metadata-claims and on Seaman claiming none of his info has been inaccurate. If you have any questions, feel free to ask!
